![]() ![]() ![]() An innovative take on the disciplines of Cultural Studies and Post-Marxism with a clear account of what Cultural Studies and post-Marxism are and why they are important.Because of this stalemate, Post-Marxism versus Cultural Studies proposes a new theory of pragmatic intervention †“ one that is derived from Derridean deconstruction, post-Marxism and Cultural Studies, and which will be of importance and value for politicised academics and intellectuals working in all areas of political and Cultural Studies.Key Features Bowman examines these intertwined, overlapping, controversial and contested claims and orientations by way of a deconstructive reading that is led by the question of intervention: what is the intervention of post-Marxism, of Cultural Studies, of each into the other, and into other institutional and political contexts and scenes?Through considerations of key aspects of Cultural Studies and cultural theory, Post-Marxism versus Cultural Studies argues that the very thing that is fundamental to both of these ‘politicised'approaches †“ the quest to establish a theory of intervention, and to relate this to a practice †“ actually remains frustrated and unrealised as a direct result of the way this has been approached. Post-Marxism presents itself as having a developed theory of political strategy, while Cultural Studies has claimed to be both practical and political. It argues that although Cultural Studies and post-Marxism tend to present themselves as distinct entities, they actually share a project †“ that of taking on the political. Post-Marxism Versus Cultural Studies by Paul Bowman Post-Marxism versus Cultural Studies is an innovative exploration of the ethical and political significance of Cultural Studies and Post-Marxist discourse theory. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |